We pride ourselves on rational decision-making. We gather data, model scenarios, and debate in well-lit conference rooms. Yet, so many strategic choices still feel like a gamble. Why? Because we focus obsessively on the decision itself while ignoring the more critical factor: the mindset of the decider.

Imagine a dartboard. This isn’t a board of outcomes, but of mental positions from which we throw our proverbial darts. Your accuracy is predetermined not by the target, but by where you stand before you even take aim.

Most leaders operate from one of four quadrants on the Decision Making Dartboard.

In the top-left, we have the Wild Gambler. This quadrant is driven by instinct, ego, and a thirst for the dramatic “gut feel.” The Gambler thrives on speed and disruption, often mistaking recklessness for courage. Their darts are thrown with flair, but they scatter wildly, creating as much chaos as opportunity.

To the right lies the Frozen Analyst. Paralyzed by the need for perfect information, the Analyst endlessly models scenarios, seeking a 100% guarantee that can never exist. Their desk is buried in data, but the board remains untouched. The market moves on while they are still calculating wind resistance.

Below them sits the Comfortable Consensus-Seeker. For this player, the goal is not the optimal outcome, but universal agreement. They poll the room, dilute strong ideas into palatable mush, and throw the dart where it will offend the fewest. The result is a safe, mediocre shot that lands precisely where you’d expect—nowhere near a bullseye.

Finally, there is the Strategic Player in the bottom-right. This is the sweet spot. The Strategic Player understands that not all decisions require the same process. They possess the Gambler’s bias for action but temper it with the Analyst’s respect for key data. They value the team’s input but are not held hostage by it. They are defined by one crucial behavior: they consciously choose their decision-making style to fit the context. Is this a crisis requiring a swift, unilateral call? Or a foundational strategic shift demanding robust debate and buy-in?

The first step to improving your decisions is not to sharpen your darts, but to check your feet. In your next leadership meeting, before a major decision is made, pause and ask: “From which quadrant are we about to throw?”

What’s our stance? Are we being Frozen Analysts on an issue that demands a 70% solution now? Are we acting as Wild Gamblers with the company’s core value proposition? Acknowledging your position on the dartboard is the singular most powerful step toward breaking the cycle of flawed outcomes.

Stop focusing solely on the target. Master your stance, and the bullseyes will follow.

About Author

Fay Niewiadomski

I awaken leaders to purposefully discern the best way forward, with such clarity, that they find within themselves the courage, wisdom, and compassion to do what they never dared to do before.

I’ve been privileged to work closely with C-level officers, presidents, ministers, global chairpersons, diplomats, board members, senior business and political leaders, and their teams to successfully navigate complex, high-stakes situations and make sound business and personal decisions resulting in profound and lasting change.

See author's posts